Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Robusta Coffee to Water Deficit under Field Conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25186/.v21i.2431Abstract
The sustainability of Coffea canephora cultivation in regions prone to water stress depends on the selection of cultivars adapted to water management conditions and environmental variability. This study aimed to evaluate the physiological and biochemical parameters of robusta coffee cultivars under different soil water tensions. The experiment was conducted in a split-plot design, combining five soil water tensions (20 kPa, 40 kPa, 60 kPa, 100 kPa, and no irrigation) and six robusta coffee cultivars (BRS 1216, BRS 2299, BRS 2314, BRS 3210, BRS 3213, and BRS 3220), allocated as main plots and subplots, respectively. The experimental design was randomized blocks with three replicates. Over two years, plants in the growth (2021) and production (2022) phases were evaluated for gas exchange, chlorophyll-a fluorescence, membrane damage, relative water content, and levels of photosynthetic pigments and
metabolites. Non-irrigated young robusta plants exhibited lower photosynthetic rate (A) and transpiration (E), along with reduced stomatal conductance (gS). The photochemical efficiency of PSII and energy dissipation mechanisms, except for NPQ, were also lower without irrigation. Soluble carbohydrate levels were negatively correlated with photosynthesis. During the growth phase, cultivars BRS 1216 and BRS 3210 showed higher photosynthetic productivity, while BRS 2314 had the lowest. It was concluded that stomatal regulation and light absorption adjustments in PSII, through reductions in Fv/Fm and photosynthetic pigment levels, are key mechanisms in robusta coffee plants to mitigate water stress damage. Additionally, the cultivars maintained photosynthetic performance under high soil water tension, suggesting their suitability for cultivation under low irrigation levels.
Key words: Coffea canephora; Robustas Amazônicos;Water deficit; Irrigation.
References
AGRITEMPO. (2024). Sistema de monitoramento agrometeorológico. Dados meteorológicos: Acre. Available in: https://www.agritempo.gov.br/br/rede-de-estacoes/
Alvares, C. A. et al. (2013). Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22(6):711-728.
Araujo, L. F. B. D. et al. (2021). Genetic divergence based on leaf vegetative and anatomical traits of Coffea canephora clones. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 42(5):2717-2734.
Bates, L. S. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Short communication. Plant and Soil, 39:205-207.
Bonomo, R. et al (2016). Uso eficiente da água na irrigação do cafeeiro Conilon. In F. L. Partelli., & Bonomo, R. Café conilon: o clima e o manejo da planta. Alegre, ES: CAUFES, Cap. 6, (pp. 93-110).
Borgo, L. et al. (2025). Impact of drought, heat, excess light, and salinity on coffee production: strategies for mitigating stress through plant breeding and nutrition. Agriculture, 15(1):9.
Bote, A. D., & Jan, V. (2016). Branch growth dynamics, photosynthesis, yield and bean size distribution in response to fruit load manipulation in coffee trees. Trees, 30(4):1275-1285.
Cairo, P. A. R. (1995). Curso básico de relações hídricas de plantas. Vitória da Conquista. UESB, 32p.
Catarino, I. C. A. et al. (2021). Elevated [CO2] mitigates drought effects and increases leaf 5-O-Caffeoylquinic acid and caffeine concentrations during the early growth of Coffea Arabica Plants. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5:676207.
Cavalcanti, F. R. et al. (2004). Superoxide dismutase, catalase and peroxidase activities do not confer protection against oxidative damage in salt-stressed cowpea leaves. New Phytologist, 163:563-571.
Chekol, H. et al. (2024). Drought stress responses in arabica coffee genotypes: physiological and metabolic insights. Plants, 13(6):828.
Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento - CONAB. (2025). Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de café. Brasília, DF: CONAB, v. 12, n. 1. Available in: https://www.gov.br/conab/pt-br/atuacao/informacoes-agropecuarias/safras/safra-de-cafe/1o-levantamento-de-cafe-safra-2025/boletim-cafe-janeiro-2025
Covre, A. M. et al. (2022). How is the fruit development of Coffea canephora trees modulated by the water supply? An analysis of growth curves for irrigated and rainfed systems. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 43(5):2359-2374.
Covre, A. M. et al. (2015). Distribuição do manejo radicular de cafeeiro conilon irrigado e não irrigado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 50(11):1006-1016.
Custódio, A. M. et al. (2022). Seasonal variation in physiological traits of amazonian Coffea canephora genotypes in cultivation systems with contrasting water availability. Agronomy, 12:3197.
Damatta, F. M., & Ramalho, J. D. C. (2006). Impacts of drought and temperature stress on coffee physiology and production: a review. Brazilian journal of plant physiology, 18(1):55-81.
Davis, A. P. et al. (2011). Growing coffee: Psilanthus (Rubiaceae) subsumed on the basis of molecular and morphological data: implications for the size, morphology, distribution and evolutionary history of Coffea. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 167(1):357-377.
Deuner, S. et al. (2011). Stomatal behavior and components of the antioxidative system in coffee plants under water stress. Scientia Agricola, 68(1):77-85.
Dubois, M. et al. (1956). Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry, 28:350-356.
Espindula, M. C. et al. (2022). Robustas Amazônicos: os cafeeiros cultivados em Rondônia. Brasília, DF: Embrapa.
Espindula, M. C. et al (2019). Novas cultivares de cafeeiros Coffea canephora para a Amazônia Ocidental Brasileira: Principais características: Comunicado Técnico 413. Porto Velho: Embrapa Rondônia.
Ferrão, R. G. et al. (2017). Café conilon. (2a ed. atual. e ampl). Vitória, ES: Incaper. 784p.
Ferreira, D. F. (2014). Sisvar: a guide for its Bootstrap procedures in multiple comparisons. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 38(2):109-112.
Genuchten, M. T. (1980). Closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society American Journal, Madison, 44(3):892-898.
Guidi, L. et al. (2019). Chlorophyll fluorescence, photoinhibition and abiotic stress: does it make any difference the fact to be a C3 or C4 species? Frontiers in plant science, 10:174.
International Coffee Organization- ICO. (2025). What's new. Available in: http://www.ico.org/.
Lichtenthaler, H. K., & Wellburn, A. R. (1983). Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophyll a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical Societ Transactions, 11:591-603.
Machado Filho, J. A. et al. (2021). Linking root and stem hydraulic traits to leaf physiological parameters in Coffea canephora clones with contrasting drought tolerance. Journal of plant Physiology, 258:153355.
Marçal, D. M. et al. (2021). Elevated [CO2] benefits coffee growth and photosynthetic performance regardless of light availability. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 158:524-535.
Marsetti, M. M. S. et al. (2013). Déficit hídrico e fatores climáticos na uniformidade da florada do cafeeiro conilon irrigado. Revista Brasileira de Agricultura Irrigada, 7(6):371-380.
Martins, S. C. V. et al. (2019). How do coffee trees deal with severe natural droughts? An analysis of hydraulic, diffusive and biochemical components at the leaf level. Trees, 33:1679-1693.
Max, A. C. et al. (2023). A bitter future for coffee production? Physiological traits associated with yield reveal high vulnerability to hydraulic failure in Coffea canephora. Plant, Cell & Environment, 46(3):764-779.
Melo, B. P. et al. (2020). Transcriptional modulation of AREB-1 by CRISPRa improves plant physiological performance under severe water deficit. Scientific Reports, 10(1):1-10.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available in: https://www.r-project.org/
Rodrigues, W. P. et al. (2016). Whole-canopy gas exchanges in Coffea sp. is affected by supra-optimal tem-perature and light distribution within the canopy: The insights from an improved multi-chamber system. Scientia Horticulturae, 211:194-202.
Rodrigues, W. P. et al. (2018). Stomatal and photochemical limitations of photosynthesis in coffee (Coffea spp.) plants subjected to elevated temperatures. Crop and Pasture Science, 69(3):317-325.
Ronchi, C. P., & Damatta, F. M. (2017). Aspectos Fisiológicos do Café Conilon. In R. G. Ferrão. et al. Café conilon. (2ª ed., atual. e ampl). Vitória, ES: Incaper, Cap. 5, (pp.103-129).
Sanches, R. F. E. et al. (2017). Influência da alta concentração atmosférica de CO2 (↑[CO2]atm) × disponibilidade hídrica nas relações hídricas, trocas gasosas e acúmulo de carboidratos em Coffea arabica L. Hoehnea, 44:635-643, 2017.
Santos, H. G. dos. et al. (2018). Sistema Brasileiro de classificação de solos. (5ª. ed. rev. e ampl). Brasília, DF: Embrapa.
Santos, T. B. et al. (2022). Physiological responses to drought, salinity, and heat stress in plants: a review. Stresses, 2(1):113-135.
Semedo, J. N. et al. (2021). Intrinsic non-stomatal resilience to drought of the photosynthetic apparatus in Coffea spp. is strengthened by elevated air [CO2]. Tree Physiology, 41(5):708-727.
Silva, M. J. G. et al. (2015). Clima. In A. L. Marcolan., & M. C. Espindula. Café na Amazônia. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, Cap. 2, (pp.41-55).
Solimões, F. C. R. et al. (2023). Seasonal vegetative growth of Coffea canephora associated with two water management in the South-Western Amazon. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 44(4):1265-1286.
Souza, B. P. et al. (2020). Gas exchanges and chlorophyll fluorescence of young coffee plants submitted to water and nitrogen stresses. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 43(16):2455-2465.
Teixeira, A. L. et al. (2020). Amazonian Robustas-new Coffea canephora coffee cultivars for the Western Brazilian Amazon. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 20(3):e323420318.
Torres, G. A. L. et al. (2024). General scenario of the use of geoclimatic, morphological and physiological factors in the analysis of coffee genotypes with tolerance to the impact of drought: a review. Euphytica, 220:170.
Yamane, K. et al. (2022). Temperature tolerance threshold and mechanism of oxidative damage in the leaf of Coffea arabica ‘Typica’ under heat stress. Plant Production Science, 25(3):337-349.
Yemm, E. W., & Cocking, E. F. (1955). The determination of amino acids with ninhydrin. Analyst, 80:209-213.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Coffee Science - ISSN 1984-3909The copyright of the articles published in this journal belongs to the authors, with the journal holding the first publication rights. As the articles are published in this journal under open access, they may be freely used, with proper attribution, for educational and non-commercial purposes
